Your message dated Tue, 8 Mar 2022 06:38:03 +0100 with message-id <[email protected]> and subject line Re: Bug#801067: nfs-common: Remove or updated README.Debian.nfsv4 has caused the Debian Bug report #801067, regarding nfs-common: Remove or updated README.Debian.nfsv4 to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 801067: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=801067 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: nfs-common Version: 1:1.2.8-6ubuntu1.1 Severity: normal The README.Debian.nfsv4 file is now rather old; is NFSv4 really still considered experimental? Parts of this file may be worth keeping (I’m not an expert!), but at least that claim should be removed, and mention of kernel versions and patch sets. -- Package-specific info: -- rpcinfo -- program vers proto port service 100000 4 tcp 111 portmapper 100000 3 tcp 111 portmapper 100000 2 tcp 111 portmapper 100000 4 udp 111 portmapper 100000 3 udp 111 portmapper 100000 2 udp 111 portmapper 100024 1 udp 43250 status 100024 1 tcp 59720 status -- /etc/default/nfs-common -- NEED_STATD= STATDOPTS= NEED_GSSD= -- /etc/idmapd.conf -- [General] Verbosity = 0 Pipefs-Directory = /run/rpc_pipefs [Mapping] Nobody-User = rrt Nobody-Group = rrt -- /etc/fstab -- -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers trusty-updates APT policy: (500, 'trusty-updates'), (500, 'trusty-security'), (500, 'trusty'), (400, 'trusty-proposed'), (100, 'trusty-backports'), (90, 'wily-updates'), (90, 'wily') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.13.0-63-generic (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages nfs-common depends on: ii adduser 3.113+nmu3ubuntu3 ii initscripts 2.88dsf-41ubuntu6.2 ii libc6 2.19-0ubuntu6.6 ii libcap2 1:2.24-0ubuntu2 ii libcomerr2 1.42.9-3ubuntu1.3 ii libdevmapper1.02.1 2:1.02.77-6ubuntu2 ii libevent-2.0-5 2.0.21-stable-1ubuntu1.14.04.1 ii libgssglue1 0.4-2ubuntu1 ii libkeyutils1 1.5.6-1 ii libkrb5-3 1.12+dfsg-2ubuntu5.1 ii libmount1 2.20.1-5.1ubuntu20.7 ii libnfsidmap2 0.25-5 ii libtirpc1 0.2.2-5ubuntu2 ii libwrap0 7.6.q-25 ii lsb-base 4.1+Debian11ubuntu6 ii mountall 2.53 ii rpcbind 0.2.1-2ubuntu2.2 ii sysv-rc 2.88dsf-41ubuntu6.2 ii ucf 3.0027+nmu1 Versions of packages nfs-common recommends: ii python 2.7.5-5ubuntu3 Versions of packages nfs-common suggests: pn open-iscsi <none> pn watchdog <none> Versions of packages nfs-kernel-server depends on: ii libblkid1 2.20.1-5.1ubuntu20.7 ii libc6 2.19-0ubuntu6.6 ii libcap2 1:2.24-0ubuntu2 ii libsqlite3-0 3.8.2-1ubuntu2.1 ii libtirpc1 0.2.2-5ubuntu2 ii libwrap0 7.6.q-25 ii lsb-base 4.1+Debian11ubuntu6 ii ucf 3.0027+nmu1 -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Source: nfs-utils Source-Version: 1:2.6.1-1 On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 09:32:39PM +0100, Reuben Thomas wrote: > Package: nfs-common > Version: 1:1.2.8-6ubuntu1.1 > Severity: normal > > The README.Debian.nfsv4 file is now rather old; is NFSv4 really still > considered experimental? > > Parts of this file may be worth keeping (I???m not an expert!), but at least > that claim should be removed, and mention of kernel versions and patch sets. We have removed the outdated README.Debian.nfsv4 in the 1:2.6.1-1 upload. Regards, Salvatore
--- End Message ---
