On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:08:30 +0100, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 02:29:52PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >> >> Hi Eduard (and cc kernel list), >> >> I have put together a draft for future kernel module handling, >> based on a discussion at the kernel list and spiced up with a few >> thoughts of my own. It is available here: >> http://wiki.debian.org/KernelModulesPackaging >> >> Could you please have a look and tell me what you think (or perhaps >> simply edit that wiki page directly)? > Notice that you again sided with Manoj, depite him never providing > any arguments in favour of not using the standard upstream mandated > build symlink, his is a mnischaracterization of my position, but then, I have come to expect that. The upstream convention of using /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/build is supported, has been supported, and shall be supported by kernel-package in the future. > and since both of you prefered resulting to insults instead of > reasoned argumentations, i want to have no plan with any such plans > as you have, so go ahead, and break everything for all i care. Packages built using kernel-package coherently are not broken. Just more FUD and slander. manoj -- "Some would sooner die than think. In fact, they often do." Bertrand Russell Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
