On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 08:39:58PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 08:03:59PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > > This needs a reverse-lookup to generate the dependencies. > > The dependencies can be set by hand, i believe, and don't really need to be > > set by arch, the important thing is the list of actual tools used. > > Eek, you really want to depend against a tool which can't be used > anyway?
Well. ... > > Yeah, well. might be overkill for what we need, do we really need all this > > complexity ? > > One or two levels of lookups don't really make a difference. But I think > this makes it more robust. Less nice to look at though :) > > > I'm not sure about the linux-initramfs-tool part of the dependency. > > That is a virtual package, so future ramdisk tool can satisft the > > dependency, > > without needing to recompile the kernel. > > No, I was not sure how to handle this part of the dependency group. Just add it by default always ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
