Control: tags -1 + confirmed upstream

Hi,

On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 04:08:07PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Control: tags -1 - moreinfo unreproducible
> 
> Hi Timo,
> 
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 03:15:18AM +0200, Timo Sigurdsson wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Salvatore Bonaccorso schrieb am 10.09.2023 12:21 (GMT +02:00):
> > 
> > > Would it be possible to provide a minimal set of rules triggering the
> > > issue? Can you reproduce the issue with the official build?
> > 
> > So, I did some more testing on a different machine running the official 
> > build. My findings so far are:
> > 1) Yes, I can reproduce the issue with the official build.
> > 2) The issue depends on the ruleset. The minimal ruleset I have on that 
> > machine, doesn't trigger the issue, but when I copy over the ruleset from 
> > the machine I first observed this on, then I can reproduce it.
> > 
> > I'm attaching a somewhat stripped down version of my original, rather 
> > complex ruleset. It's by no means a "minimal" reproducer, cause I haven't 
> > had the time yet to further reduce it in order to see what actually 
> > triggers it. But you should be able to observe that this ruleset loads just 
> > fine on linux 6.1.38-4, but doesn't anymore on 6.1.52-1.
> 
> Thanks for providing it, this helps debugging the issue.
> 
> > I also started looking into what commit could have introduced this. My 
> > first guess "netfilter: nft_dynset: disallow object maps" (23185c6aed1f) is 
> > wrong. Even with this one reverted, the issue occurs. I'll try another 
> > build with "netfilter: nf_tables: disallow rule addition to bound chain via 
> > NFTA_RULE_CHAIN_ID" (0ebc1064e487) reverted tomorrow evening...
> 
> Thanks, as soon we have the introducing commit we can go to the next
> step and check upstream. I cannot trigger the problem with 6.4.13-1 or
> 6.5.2.

The issue seems to be present already in 6.1.49-rc1, which I had still
from local pareparations for the rebases. So the bisection needs to go
to the upstream versions between 6.1.38 and 6.1.49 at least.

Regards,
Salvatore

Reply via email to