On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 04:49:10PM +0100, Pascal A. Dupuis wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 02:55:13PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > Linux version 2.6.14-2-powerpc (Debian 2.6.14-3) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc > > version 4.0.3 20051023 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.2-3.sven.1)) #2 Thu Nov 10 > > 11:55:12 UTC 2005 > > > > This is mine, for example, and you see that it is 2.6.14-2-powerpc official > > kernel built from debian source 2.6.14-3. > > > Sven, > > thank you for your reply. Mine reads: > Linux version 2.6.14.3 () ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.0.2 (Debian > 4.0.2-2)) #1 Mon Nov 28 12:39:26 CET 2005 > > So ... > 1) the 2.6.14.3 is VERSION + the EXTRAVERSION I forced with make-kpkg > 2) the debian source is empty > > The suggestion was also to avoid name clashes, i.e. > linux-patch-debian-2.6.14_2.6.14-2_all.deb -> applied on 2.6.14 > linux-patch-debian-2.6.14_2.6.14-3_all.deb -> applied on 2.6.14.2 > linux-patch-debian-2.6.14_2.6.14-4_all.deb -> applied on 2.6.14.3 > > thus, compiling with one of the three versions should not result each > time in vmlinuz-2.6.14 but vmlinuz-2.6.14[.extraversion]
This is some magic Bastian Blank played with, Bastian, could you comment on this ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]