On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 03:02:28PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051229 11:47]: > > > The main problem are the too strict rules for building in volatile, which > > > stop > > > us from uploading the etch/sid kernels and associated packages to it. > > > > Actually, I think we should first consider which kernel minor version we > > want to use (including of course the requirements on the user side like > > udev, devfs, ...), and if we have done that, resolve any technical > > issues with the infrastructure. > > 2.6.15 should work with older udev. > > initramfs-tools will depend on the version of udev that is chosen for > volatile, we have supported different version of it, > so that is fixable. > > klibc is easy to backport. > last i heard that busybox doen't build on sarge glibc? is that still true?
mmm, maybe i misunderstand, but shouldn't you be building busybox with klibc, if you put it inside the image ? > that would rule out initramfs-tools unless there is known fix for that. > > yaird has the bigger perl dependendency, but that is said to be working > with the sarge modules. Indeed, i can confirm that, it would break the upgrade from sarge 2.4 kernels, but the upgrade from sarge 2.6.8 kernels is ok. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
