On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 02:56:10AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:53:03 +0100 > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 04:00:00PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > > On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:05:25 +0100, Sven Luther > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 10:33:25AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > > >> reassign 346281 linux-2.6 thanks > > > >> > > > >> Hi, > > > >> > > > >> If you have decided that putting the build link in headers is > > > >> correct, then you get to fix this. The kernel-package tool does > > > >> it dofferently, and while you are not required to follow what k-p > > > >> does, any non-standard and unsupported changes you make to the > > > >> way k-p works is your responsibility to fix. > > > > > > > Whatever, i think the build directory should just work, and that > > > > was the agreement we had back then on this. I assumed this was > > > > indeed the case. Any idea what exactly is going wrong here. > > > > > > Define "just work". And the agreement I recall was codified > > > on http://wiki.debian.org/KernelModulesPackaging > > > > Jonas and you wrote that one unilaterally despite my protests, i don't > > recognize that document. And since jonas seems to be kind-of MIA > > since a couple of weeks, this leaves only you. > > I am alive and well. Just tired of discussing with you, Sven.
Well, this was the impression i got from the lack of new yaird upload, but hey, nice to see you around. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
