Control: tag -1 + moreinfo Hello,
On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 05:52:49PM +0000, gregg wrote: > [279753.808435] Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical > address 0xfeffffff9286f8b0: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI This looks like a bitflip, the address used should probably be 0xffffffff9286f8b0. Is this problem reproducible for you? Does it always happen on the same address? Is that a regression (i.e. earlier kernels work fine)? Can you run a memtest on your machine please? (Install memtest86+ and boot into it.) Best regards Uwe
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
