Your message dated Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:16:35 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing all those bug reports, as they where erroneously
labeled closed-in-NMU.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jan 2005 07:50:09 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 10 23:50:09 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from k1.dinoex.de [80.237.200.138] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CoGn2-0003JV-00; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 23:50:08 -0800
Received: from eris.sebi.org ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [80.237.237.122])
by k1.dinoex.de (8.13.2/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j0B7nc6L098370
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 08:49:44 +0100 (CET)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from eris.sebi.org ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by eris.sebi.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Debian-15) with ESMTP id j0B7nbld004342
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 08:49:38 +0100
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by eris.sebi.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j0B7nbco004339;
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 08:49:37 +0100
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 08:49:37 +0100
From: Sebastian Bork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: kernel-source-2.6.10: blank screen with static vesafb driver
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.1
X-PGP: 1024D/42DFB65F D4B1 7EC8 8674 EEAD D97F 36E3 6BF4 5152 42DF B65F
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: kernel-source-2.6.10
Version: 2.6.10-3
Severity: important
Again the vesafb driver does only lead to a blank screen when compiled
in statically, just like the bug pending for kernel-source-2.6.9. The
problem exists within the Debian patches only. When I use the vesafb.c
out of the kernel.org sources, everything works as expected.
Please fix that patch to make the next kernel source package usable with
vesafb again! It's a pity the Debian kernels are unusable for weeks now.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages kernel-source-2.6.10 depends on:
ii binutils 2.15-5 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii bzip2 1.0.2-1 A high-quality block-sorting file
ii coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-2 The GNU core utilities
ii fileutils 5.2.1-2 The GNU file management utilities
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 289810-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jan 2006 12:18:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 11 04:18:06 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp8.wanadoo.fr ([193.252.22.23])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EwevW-0003iZ-4B
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 04:18:06 -0800
Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mwinf0802.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 5A6D91C00221
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:17:35 +0100 (CET)
Received: from pegasos (AStrasbourg-251-1-48-86.w82-126.abo.wanadoo.fr
[82.126.221.86])
by mwinf0802.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 3AC9C1C00204;
Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:17:35 +0100 (CET)
X-ME-UUID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sven by pegasos with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1Eweu9-0001um-0K; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:16:41 +0100
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:16:35 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Closing all those bug reports, as they where erroneously labeled
closed-in-NMU.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SORBS
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5
As subject says.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
