Your message dated Sun, 06 Sep 2026 12:18:57 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#1146782: fixed in dracut 112-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1146782,
regarding Ensure split dracut packages are upgraded together
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
1146782: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1146782
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: dracut
Version: 112-2
Severity: normal

Hi,

I've noticed that the individual dracut binary packages can be 
installed in mixed versions. I assume this is not a particularly 
well-tested situation.

Many other source packages configure their binary packages with a 
strict version dependency.

As an example, dracut-network currently has:

  Depends: dracut-core

This allows a simultaneous installation of dracut-network 112-2 and 
dracut 106-6.

If dracut-network were to switch to

  Depends: dracut-core (= ${binary:Version})

Then apt would install the packages in lockstep, and no probably 
badly-supported situations would arise.

Similar dependencies should probably be set in dracut, dracut-test,
and maybe from dracut-core to dracut-install.

Best,
Chris

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: dracut
Source-Version: 112-4
Done: Benjamin Drung <[email protected]>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
dracut, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Benjamin Drung <[email protected]> (supplier of updated dracut package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2026 13:35:35 +0200
Source: dracut
Built-For-Profiles: derivative.ubuntu noudeb
Architecture: source
Version: 112-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team <[email protected]>
Changed-By: Benjamin Drung <[email protected]>
Closes: 1146782
Changes:
 dracut (112-4) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Cherry-pick several upstream commits:
     - fix(dracut): correct order of "Creating image" log line
     - perf(lsinitrd): call extractor only once in extract_squash_img
     - fix(drm): add leds-qcom-lpg to aarch64 specific modules needed by drm
   * Ensure split dracut packages are upgraded together (Closes: #1146782)
Checksums-Sha1:
 69ed08ec2c6afc9ba21b53fc908c947c1b88eafc 3277 dracut_112-4.dsc
 e5719ba1f9f9e1f534cd907e1fd35c52cc29a448 56156 dracut_112-4.debian.tar.xz
 1dce86244ebc6f9d4a7471d7998dd8fddd6829c3 9129 dracut_112-4_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 a0983059c70cc46e3f79af2cba1443f3f9b1caed1a2a25433bde4e69f9ef219b 3277 
dracut_112-4.dsc
 214b457f5928096d731270b33dd6079af4f1d9591370d2157f1a147e4ce65a4c 56156 
dracut_112-4.debian.tar.xz
 f1c6cd5b4689f319dddab5b41126ef762d90752f058bf450fced77c35223f3fa 9129 
dracut_112-4_source.buildinfo
Files:
 db5662541583776c4b46f9f71270ec6c 3277 utils optional dracut_112-4.dsc
 846b58b7501468c7b9adbfeda51cef86 56156 utils optional 
dracut_112-4.debian.tar.xz
 91b60b89d35b825e3cf0520c7ed66094 9129 utils optional 
dracut_112-4_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=PUpB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: pgp7kJakwxcto.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to