On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 06:35:29PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 10:59:54PM -0700, dann frazier wrote: > > I think I'll go ahead and put this into our tree & revert if it causes > > problems. > > It is better to add it to the s390 patch.
Could you please explain why you think that is better. I'm not sure that I understand the merrits of adding a fix into the mish-mash of a much larger patch, rather than leaving it separate. Does it have (a negative) impact on other architectures? > > The vulnerable code looks to be present in 2.4.27 as well, but I don't > > see a patch in either kernel-source-2.4.27 or the s390 patch package. > > I've tried my hand at porting it (below). Should we apply it? If so, > > where is the proper place to submit it upstream - direct to > > lkml/Marcelo? > > 2.4 vanilla does not work for s390 and it is not longer supported by > ibm. That may be true, but isn't 2.4.27 s390 still in Sarge? I guess we should addit to sarge2, but leave Marcelo out of the loop. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
