On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 10:24:51AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 01:51:52AM +0000, Horms wrote: > > Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Oh look, why are you still fighting about this? It seems to me that the > > > real problem is that the via module doesn't declare a relation to > > > ide-generic in situations where it actually does need it. Why not fix > > > the kernel, so that yaird doesn't have to bend over backwards? Not that > > > I really care either way, but it does seem to me to be cleaner to fix > > > the underlying problem rather than adding increasingly nonsensical > > > special case code somewhere else to work around it. > > > > Can someone cook up a patch for this and send it upstream and/or here? > > I guess this means someone needs to investigate it with the hardware that is > broken in the first place. Nobody seemed interested in doing so, and i don't > have broken via-ide x86 hardware myself. > > Now, can we please get the borken hack in yaird be backed out or at least > disabled on powerpc as my patch proposed ?
As I subsequently mentioned on IRC, I have some Via hardware, though I'm not sure if its broken or not. If someone wants me to run tests, please let me know. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
