-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 14:36:39 +0100 Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The quality of the maintainers of both tool also play an important > role in which tool to chose as standard, and we have a pretty good > feedback from both the initramfs-tools maintainer and upstream, while > for yaird, the upstream maintainer seems to be MIA since around late > december, and the debian maintainer seems to be unable to fix a bug > or even looking at patches without getting feedback from the upstream > maintainer, which makes yaird unsuitable to be the default. ...says a single member of the kernel team. I would appreciate comments from other members of the kernel team on this issue. Most friendly, - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEAwZDn7DbMsAkQLgRAiwCAKCI07/HyDWg/xwn/vY1bBBtek0ylACeJ6ZW h5acslgPIZLxixJkPrrNKV0= =v2PD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
