On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 02:10:44AM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: > That "other stuff" is what I'm interested in, at this point; waldi > claims to be working on stuff[0]. Waldi, can you please expand upon > that?
It works properly for linux-nonfree-2.6. For further informations please
take a look at <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Known problems:
- modules may want to have its one version and the software currently
relays on our versions.
- The linux-headers-UPSTREAMVERSION-ABINAME-ARCH provides needs to be
changed as it may clash with real packages. I think
linux-headers-UPSTREAMVERSION-ABINAME-all-ARCH should be okay.
> It would be nice to automate binary module package creation when
> a new kernel is released. The last I heard, this was planned by making
> the buildds automatically rebuild packages.
You have to do source uploads anyway.
> If that is the case, who
> will be handling the source packages for those binary module packages?
My proposal was:
- Binary packages with modules sources are maintained by whoever wants
it.
- Binary modules packages are maintained exclusive by the kernel or
another team.
Bastian
--
No one may kill a man. Not for any purpose. It cannot be condoned.
-- Kirk, "Spock's Brain", stardate 5431.6
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
