maximilian attems wrote: [snip] > > - HZ_250 instead of HZ_1000: If I remember correctly, we kept HZ_1000 > > because it was the prior default. IMHO, we should follow upstream and > > change the default to HZ_250 too. > > > > A short pro/cons is here: http://kerneltrap.org/node/5411 > > > > Considering we plan to use the smp-alternatives patches for both amd64 > > and i386, at least here HZ_250 makes sense. For the other arches and > > flavours, either HZ_100 for smp and HZ_1000 for up/desktop flavours > > could make sense, or just HZ_250 too for the sake of simplicity. > > > > There will for sure be users requesting to revert this change, similar > > to PREEMPT, so I would like to have a concensus in the team regarding > > this option. > > i would stick with HZ_250 everywhere. > the upstream change seems not contested since.
Agreed. Thiemo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
