Sven Luther wrote: > On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 11:30:46AM -0500, Cord Beermann wrote: > > Hallo! Du (Thiemo Seufer) hast geschrieben: > > > > > > >what about that? > > > > > > > > > >debian-devel-kernel@ > > > > > > I would personally prefer debian-kernel-devel, but in the end of the > > > > day > > > > it is not that important. If you have any reasons to prefer > > > > debian-devel-kernel over debian-kernel-devel, go ahead with it. We are > > > > drowning in bug traffic on debian-kernel, so i'm pretty sure that the > > > > new > > > > list, whatever the name is, will be welcome :-). > > > > > > I would also prefer debian-kernel-devel, just because it sorts the > > > mbox names nicely together. :-) > > > > :-) > > > > debian-kernel-maint? > > debian-kernel-bugs ? > > If this is to hold the bug reports, it is more logical. The debian-kernel is > by definition a devel list, so having d-k-fdevel in addition will probabluy be > confusing.
The point is to *keep* d-k the bug report list instead of trying to re-route the bug reports for all kernels released ever. Thiemo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
