On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 11:57:51AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-16 17:04]: > > I believe there's a rough consensus to not ship 2.4 in etch. Anyone > > object to a filing of bugs to remove these packages from etch? > > For mips/mipsel, there's at least one sub-arch that is not in 2.6 yet. > It's getting close though, but in the meantime I'd like to keep 2.4. > > For arm, I've recently removed the last bits of 2.4 from d-i and I was > going to request the removal after the next d-i beta. > > In general, imho 2.4 should be removed from d-i first for each arch, > and then after the next beta the 2.4 kernel images can be removed. We > can start with the removal of 2.4 from those architectures which no > longer use 2.4 at all (e.g. powerpc).
This makes sense to me; maybe we should create a hitlist of 2.4 stuff that needs to be removed before etch, and remove all the bits that don't break d-i now, something like: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel2%2e4EtchHitList -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
