On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 12:34:49AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 09:16:47AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:09:18PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:54:33AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > > > > > Other issues: > > > > > > * NEW > > > > > > Quite a lot of the arches have the newest version of linux-2.6 > > > > > > stuck in NEW for a week. I assume the ftpmasters will fix this > > > > > > soon. > > > > > Seems to be resolved now. > > > > -15 will again hit NEW. > > > And if there are failures again with -15, can we expect a -16 soon that > > > fixes them *without* needing to add new packages? > > > No. We never say that we will not include new packages, only the > > possibility is rather small. But we refuse to drop work just to > > workaround somebody else problem (NEW handling). > > So if -15 is still broken I should plan to NMU rather than count on -16 > doing anything to address the needs of testing users in a timely manner?
Get the ftp-master to not delay NEW over-much, or get a NEW-excemption for the kernel packages. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
