On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 12:44:25PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> 
> I'm installing it right now, although package is called 2.6.18-1, but
> actual version is 2.6.18-3, so if it was based on 2.6.18.2+ then bug
> should be fixed. I will add more details if this situation appeares
> again, since I can not say that it is easily reproducible.

there is no 2.6.18.2 yet, although it is in the pipe.
of course 2.6.18.1 + other fixes is there.

-- 
maks
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to