On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 18:26:57 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Sven Luther wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 09:35:56AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >>> What architecture line are we talking about here? Is there a bug >>> report number I can refer to to refresh my memory on this issue? >> >> ... >> >>> Again, what is broken about EXTRAVERSION? Which bug reports are we >>> talking about? >> >> ... >> >>> I'd be happy to look at why bits of the build process take longer >>> than a raw build without make-kpkg -- which bug number was this >>> reported under? >> >> Manoj, you see, this is part of the problem. Nearer integration of >> the kernel-package maintainer and kernel team, or you being part of >> the kernel team, doesn't necessarily mean communicating via bug >> reports. > What's wrong with filing bugreports? Especially since there is no real communication of problem, just bad mouthing the package in question, suddenly, and out of the blue. Not very conducive to things being corrected either, lacking details, debug statements, or a means to reproduce the so called fatal flaws, manoj -- Women are wiser than men because they know less and understand more. Stephens Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]