On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 11:01:57PM +0100, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > > you'd anyway newer kernels for this box and even not applied > > upstream ones, so i'd appreciate if you understand that 2.6.18 is > > not a good cut off for HP NXxxxx. > > I understand all that, but I also understand that bug reports in a > public database are good, because they document issues and help other > people find the workaround. > > In fact, I always encourage users of my own packages to file bug > reports, whether or not I can or will fix them. > > So, please do not assume that I'm bitching and moaning about your > package; I am merely documenting an issue and its workaround.
this is pretty useless in this case, if you want to do something usefull grab 2.6.20-rc3 from upstream and file bugzilla.kernel.org bugs for the open ones. afaik acpi is still not settled, may be othere ones too. linux-2.6 meta packet has way to many bogus or valid reports that a user would look at it, so i highly question this documentation. modprobe blacklisting is not like black magic and not worth to "document". -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
