On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 04:48:29PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 01:38:31PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > > Sure, I can handle them. > > Okay. > > You want to use the -XetchY namespace for security builds and the -X for > p-u uploads? The first is no problem, but the later is if we don't > update linux-2.6 in testing ASAP.
That was my default plan, but I can use -XetchY in the meantime for both since they need to be ordered anyway. > > Rebuild on every linux-2.6 update > > --------------------------------- > > fai-kernels > > user-mode-linux > > BinNMUs at least for fai-kernels will work. Ah, good point. > > Rebuild on ABI changes > > ---------------------- > > linux-latest-2.6 > > linux-modules-contrib-2.6 > > linux-modules-extra-2.6 > > linux-modules-nonfree-2.6 > > loop-aes > > nvidia-kernel-legacy-2.6.18-4-amd64 > > Hmm? What's your question? > > Does this need rebuilding? > > -------------------------- > > firmware-nonfree > > No. Except that the build dependencies will go away. A FTBFS is certainly a regression, so I suppose this should be on the ABI change list? -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
