On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 12:13:19AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Monday 04 June 2007 23:42, maximilian attems wrote: > > > what where the args against it appart from pure inertia? > > Note that you'll probably lose me as someone who occasionally helps reply > to bugs as I doubt I'll want to be subscribed to two separate kernel > lists. I suspect this will be true for others as well. > It will also mean that I will lose some sense of what is happening wrt the > kernel. > > Are there enough people who are planning to subscribe to the "bug" list > anyway or is it just going to further reduce the number of people that > see and deal with kernel BRs? > > Cheers, > FJP
the purpose is to build a sane discussion list to build up again the kernel team. if you look up fedora-kernel you get usefull info. concerning the kernel bts 50% of the reports lack info, 30% is against outdated kernels. the rest needs to get to upstream attention. yes i agree that the bts needs sorting i've done it in the past and is not fun, but that is a different issue. the svn commits should also go to -maint. regards -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
