Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 02:21:18PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 02:11:48AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: >> > I object; if and when there ever is a new upstream kernel branch that we >> > want to track separately this would have to be reverted, > >> No. We never had complete support for more than one branch. And I really >> doubt that anyone wants the sarge-maintenance-problem back. > > No, I'm sure we don't want it; but if upstream ever changes its mind later > about 2.6 being the one true kernel, we might still have it.
I agree with you Steve and personally I don't see any good reason for dropping it. -- O T A V I O S A L V A D O R --------------------------------------------- E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br --------------------------------------------- "Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]