Gunnar Wagenknecht wrote: > I can confirm this problem with linux-image-2.6.18-5-xen-amd64 on a Dell > PowerEdge 6850 with Intel Xeon CPUs. It does not occur use the non-Xen > kernel image (linux-image-2.6.18-5-amd64). > > # uname -a > Linux somehostname 2.6.18-5-xen-amd64 #1 SMP Tue Oct 2 21:48:12 UTC 2007 > x86_64 GNU/Linux > # dmesg | grep processor: > processor: Unknown symbol pm_idle > processor: Unknown symbol pm_idle > processor: Unknown symbol pm_idle > > I wonder what the consequences are. Will my processors overheat and the > system burn? > > Janusz, should I install your patch and create a custom kernel or does > my system work without it?
My server (PC clone) works without it. However, if I see that initrd images created in Debian supported way do load thermal.ko as the very first module, I think there must be a reason for this. Michael Berlin wrote: > I just read your comments on a Xen Debian bugreport: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=405140 > I've got the same problems with the Xen Image > linux-image-2.6.18-5-xen-vserver-amd64 > > Did I understand it right, that still nobody wants to fix this bug? > I must admit, I'm not willed to re-compile the kernel on my own because I > want to benefit from the Debian security updates and not always check on my > own if patches have to be applied. Maybe other kernel or initramfs-tools package maintainers, not only Bastian Blank, could share their point of view? Regards, Janusz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
