maximilian attems a écrit : > On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, aurel32 wrote: > >> This may be the goal, but the arm and mips architectures are currently >> not following this. Also note that the versatile flavour is >> unfortunately only built on armel which is not yet an official >> architecture. > > anyway that is not an excuse to go even further down that path.
I don't agree with this affirmation. Before the commit it was almost a full config file. After the commit it is also an almost full config file. Nothing has changed, it's not further down that path. > fs and network got centraly managed for 2.6.24 and you revert > that without any good reason. please fix. > Ok, will do. Should I do the same for the other arm flavours? -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
