On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 01:50:42PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Bastian Blank wrote: > > > I intend to upload linux-2.6 2.6.24-5 tomorrow. > > i think it is a bit too fast:
I don't know if its the *best* timing (for the reasons you state), but it would let us get a 2.6.24-4-based etchnhalf upload done sooner - which is a good thing, and seems to be one of the driving reasons waldi is suggesting it: * h01ger thinks a etchnhalf testkernel should just be released, for testing. doh. <waldi> no, it is not supposed to be in lenny <h01ger> testing as the act of testing. not that name.. <waldi> err, yep <waldi> will take it over as dannf did not even the proposed merge <waldi> but needs a linux-2.6 upload first fwiw, I was waiting for a 2.6.24-5 to do the above mentioned merge, but there's obviously no harm in doing it sooner. And I also agree that we need to upload to stable soon after 2.6.24-5 gets uploaded (and probably within a day or so of each 2.6.24 sid upload). > * gdth unfixed > * CONFIG_SECURITY_FILE_CAPABILITIES vs. atd Anyone object to disabling this for etchnhalf? > * huge stable-queu for 2.6.24.4 (without deadline yet although) > ~/src/stable-queue$ ls -1 queue-2.6.24/ | wc -l > 65 -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
