On 1 Apr at 21:46 Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 02:10:50PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > > Yes. Two modules claiming the same devices is a bad idea.
> > I would agree if both were automatically loaded, but as far as I can
> > tell udev would only load ide-scsi if an ide-tape device is discovered,
> > and would never load ide-tape.
>
> According to the aliases, it should only load ide-tape, never ide-scsi: |
> MODULE_ALIAS("ide:*m-tape*");
>
> Bastian
>
The point is that ide-tape is broken. #327355. If necessary, get rid of
ide-tape, not ide-scsi, or fix the former.
--
Tony van der Hoff | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Buckinghamshire, England
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
