On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 09:06:01AM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 12:14:14PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 11:56:06PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > > > Beta 2 of d-i will be using 2.6.24[1], the current version of which > > > is missing a couple of stable updates (including a handful of security > > > issues). > > > > Not necessary, 2.6.25 is available. So NACK from me. > > Right, but the d-i team has decided to go with 2.6.24 as explained in > Otavio's message. The sooner we help them get beta 2 out, the sooner > we can get 2.6.25 into testing.
On the justification that 2.6.24 has been chosen for d-i beta2 and that an updated 2.6.24 is better than the existing 2.6.24, I'm going to proceed with preparing the t-p-u update. Granted, there are valid arguments for d-i to use 2.6.25 (as there were for staying with 2.6.24), but that decision belongs to the d-i team, and it has been made. -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
