On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 03:40:38AM -0500, William Pitcock wrote: > On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 11:12 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 01:54:50AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 05:22:55PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > > > <snip> > > > > Hopefully Jeremy Fitzhardinge (from Xensource) and others can get the > > > > important Xen kernel features ported to pv_ops framework and integrated > > > > into vanilla linus kernels soon.. > > > > > > > > Status/todo: > > > > http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenParavirtOps > > > > > > > > This xensource wiki page was just updated to contain up-to-date status, > > ie. features present in 2.6.26 and features submitted for 2.6.27. > > > > > > > > Redhat/Fedora pv_ops Xen kernel dom0 support status: > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/XenPvopsDom0 > > > > > > SLES 11 will include Linux 2.6.26 with Xen patches - packages should be > > > available any day now from > > > <ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/kernel/kotd/SL110_BRANCH/i386/>. Is it > > > possible that those patches will be usable in lenny, as I believe the > > > kernel team expects to release with Linux 2.6.26? > > > > > > > Interesting.. do you know if they have dom0 support etc included? based on > > pv_ops? > > They include dom0 and are not based on paravirt_ops AFAIK. >
Argh.. even more forward porting from xensource 2.6.18 tree instead of porting to pv_ops and getting the pathes integrated upstream to vanilla kernel :( I guess it was faster _now_, but they'll have to live with the forward porting pain for years more now.. -- Pasi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]