On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 07:43:15PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 10:44:32AM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 02:52:58PM +0000, Bastian Blank wrote: > > > + * [hppa] No stable ABI, disable external modules completely. > > Would this prevent the conglomerate module packages from building on > > hppa? If so, wouldn't that break d-i (e.g., loop-aes for crypt > > partitions?) > > Yes.
Ok, then we should revert to managing the ABI files, right? Anyone object to that? > > Also - what makes the ABI of the hppa kernel any less stable than the > > other architectures? > > | 16:43 < CIA-2> 16:35 <kyle> i'm not willing to support proprietary modules > built on parisc. > | 16:43 < CIA-2> 16:39 <kyle> so, the abi issue really isn't an issue for me. > > The word of the hppa "maintainer". Yeah, but the referenced justification is invalid - this isn't only for proprietary modules and risks breaking modules required by d-i. -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
