martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > also sprach Bjørn Mork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.12.09.1413 +0100]: >> This should not apply against linux-2.6 2.6.26-11 since it is already a >> part of debian/patches/bugfix/all/stable/2.6.26.4.patch. Are you sure >> your patch really does apply? If it does, then I'd suggest trying >> *just* edcfe5f7e307846e578fb88d69fa27051fded0ab instead. > > My patch does no "apply", it was made against 2.6.26-11 -- > Supermicro just sent me their forcedeth.c and I made the patch.
Probably against the unpatched 2.6.26 then? OK, that will explain the similarities. But then the real problem must be something else. Sorry for the confusion. >> BTW, I also noticed that linux-2.6 2.6.26-11 includes the patch >> linux-2.6-2.6.26/debian/patches/features/all/net-use-gso.patch >> which very well may trigger the problem. You might also want to >> try building without that patch. > > I have not tried -11 on the server, only -8 and -10, which both had > the problems. > > How do I find out when net-use-gso.patch was added? The changelog > does not mention it, and I cannot find a repository for the source > (there are also no Vcs-* links in the package). http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.26-11/changelog#versionversion2.6.26-2 has a * net: use software GSO for SG+CSUM capable netdevices (Lennert Buytenhek) line, which matches the subject in the patch. Bjørn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
