Tyler MacDonald wrote: > Darren Salt <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Wed, Apr 01 2009, Frans Pop wrote: >> [make-kpkg] >> >> But is anyone still using it? Is there any current reason to support >> >> it > > Well, there's still some kernel options that are immutable and > multiple choice. And there's always people that want to optimize. Out of > laziness (or maybe having better things to do? <g>) my current setups > aren't make-kpkg'ed, but it would depress me if, after using make-kpkg > for years and years, I wanted to use it again one day and found that it > didn't work anymore.
Tyler, Same point as made in reply to Darren: we're not trying to find out if anyone is using make-kpkg, but whether anyone is using hook scripts that rely on the second parameter that gets passed to them. And, more in general, whether that second parameter is still needed/useful in a new API for calling the hook scripts. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
