Le Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:32:52 +0200,
Michal Suchanek <michal.sucha...@ruk.cuni.cz> a écrit :

> I can think of one reason to exclude these PCI IDs - if the libata
> piix driver is used it changes the device name.
> 
> I recall the device name changing more than once so there was
> probably some time when the driver was built, then people complained
> it changes drive names and so it was disabled.
> 
> However, the right way to disable it is to not include the driver in
> the Debian kernel config, not to break it in the source so that it
> cannot work.
> 
> Also we have UUID support by now so this issue is moot.
> 
> It is also inconsistent with other libata based pata drivers which do
> not seem to be crippled this way.
> 
> There is one other possible issue which might have caused this patch.
> In the early days of libata there was a warning that compiling
> drivers for the same device from both ide and libata subsystems may
> cause trouble but this too should be resolved by now.
> 
> Either way the patch is incorrect and it breaks functionality
> available in the upstream kernel for no good reason so it should be
> reverted.

        Hi,

  Does the announce of Bastian about enablings "pata" drivers in 2.6.31
is related to this (see
http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-kernel@lists.debian.org/msg46483.html) ?
If true, It's a good suggestion to test next stable Linux kernel !

        with regards,
                Fred.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to