On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 05:11:13PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > I request that this package *not* be dropped from unstable. > > It has concrete use cases (apparently beyond the imagination of Max). > > It does *not* require official Debian Linux kernels to work.
it does *not* work on x86, we have provided you with a long list of bugs that would needed to be fixed, which didn't happen until now. the only worktime you invested was downgrading the reported bugs. as linux-2.6 x86 Debian kernel Maintainer i ask this software to be removed as Debian unstable is not the place for exp unreleasable stuff. > Even if the Debian kernel team choose to only support a single ramdisk > generator (the one maintained by Max), others might choose to not be > similarly narrowminded. the new kid on the block is dracut and i'd be more then happy to help there, but that is a different story then this legacy one. in summary unless you come up with *real* counter reasons i stand to the rm request. -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
