On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 06:49:53PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 18:34 +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 01:31:06PM +0100, Vincent Sanders wrote: > > > This became a discussion about the general kernel packaging and how we > > > might use the upstream provided facilities better. There was some > > > discussion we have way too many ways to build a kernel. > > > > > > A general agreement was reached that "make-kpkg" should go away as > > > it is no longer adequately maintained. Action item for Vince to tell > > > Manoj it is deprecated and thank him for his contribution. > > > > What will be the recommended way to package locally built kernels in a > > .deb? At the moment, it looks like kernel-package will be a real loss > > for Debian users. > > make deb-pkg
with the great bonus, that you just need to unpack an upstream tarball or git archive and have it working. :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
