Hi Guido On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Guido Günther <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Martin, > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 04:56:17PM +0000, Martin Waite wrote: >> Hi Guido, >> >> I have abandoned using RHCS on Debian Stable. RHCS 2 in Fedora and >> Centos do not have the bug, and unfortunately in my production >> environment I will be tied to using RHCS 2. >> >> I do believe that the bug has gone away in version 3 of RHCS, but >> version 2 of RHCS as supplied by Lenny is virtually useless: it >> cannot handle failover. >> >> As a newcomer to using RHCS, it took a few days to figure out that the >> problems I was having were not caused by my configuration errors (of >> which I had many) but were actually caused by a bug. >> >> Is there some way of either removing the package or providing some >> warning to potential users that it doesn't work ? Marking the bug as >> closed seems inappropriate because it implies that the bug has been >> resolved - which is not true. Would "wont fix" be better ? > The bug is fixed in RHCS 3.0.2 so closing it is apropriate. I wouldn't > object to remove RHCS 2 from Lenny though since I never got anything to > work with RHCS2 either (neither rgmanager nor gfs). I'm cc'ing the > maintainers of the RHCS2 package in Lenny. Is there anybody really using > RHCS 2 in Lenny in production? If not we should remove it. > Cheers, > -- Guido >
On further thought, it is probably best to just leave things as they are. From exchanges with the linux-cluster mailing list, some people do use the lenny package - but patch and rebuild the source package themselves. Once squeeze is out, the cluster will work again. Thanks for your help. regards, Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
