On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 12:34:42AM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > The last ABI break was on Aug 23; and it's only used by aufs-tools. The > > idea of including it in linux-libc-dev just seems better than all other > > options. So I don't know how stable the ABI really is, but I have only > > seen 2 ABI breaks since March.
> 'Only'?! That sounds no more stable than the kernel module ABI. > I don't think that an unstable and esoteric interface like this belongs > in linux-libc-dev. Agreed. > > I could also include the header file into the aufs-tools source package > > like btrfs-tools does but I just think it's better to include it here, > > especially considering Debian derivatives. > Does Ubuntu include it in linux-libc-dev? No. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [email protected] [email protected] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
