On Sun, 2010-01-24 at 15:17 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jan 24, maximilian attems <m...@stro.at> wrote:
> > the plan as decided in Portland was to go forward with openvz
> > if upstream provides us with a patch in time. as currently this
> > looks quite bad (latest available patch is for 2.6.27, there is
> > no sign of a patch for 2.6.32, nor any schedule like it happened
> > to be for Lenny).
> I expect that it will be released after the first beta of RHEL 6.

I believe there already has been a beta, just not a public one.  RH
seems to be very secretive about this release.


Ben Hutchings
Any smoothly functioning technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to