On 03/16/2010 08:57 PM, maximilian attems wrote: > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 08:31:31PM +0300, Pavel Emelyanov wrote: >>> >>> a build with all of those option turned off. >>> can retest easily. >> >> Hm... Mine compiles just fine. > > cool, good news. > >>> we are uploading today 2.6.32.10 to unstable, >>> I'd like to include openvz, sorry for short notice, >>> but as you didn't rebase on top of 2.6.32.10 i have >>> trouble to extract the openvz patch for debian which >>> should be just on top of that, my git foo don't tells >>> me how to exclude the merged 2.6.32.10 >> >> I've pulled it 6 hours ago. Re-check the git. > > yes i've seen but the way it is I don't know how to extract > a plain patch of it that has just openvz on top of 2.6.32.10 > previously i would do > git log 7f5e918e62cbc9ac27c2f47d3c3dd4b86f67ff0e.. > /tmp/openvz > git diff 7f5e918e62cbc9ac27c2f47d3c3dd4b86f67ff0e.. >> /tmp/openvz
Hm... I'd think that $ git diff v2.6.32..HEAD made in the repo's master should work :\ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
