On Sunday 21 March 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 03:29 +0000, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > elen...@planet.nl wrote: > > >I don't think the first would be a very good idea as it means that > > > we'll still not be rid of the IDE drivers. It seems better to > > > concentrate the > > > > Indeed. Please remember that udev has at least a couple of open bugs > > about things like persistent links breaking with the IDE drivers, > > which obviously nobody cares about because other distributions stopped > > using IDE drivers long ago. > > We cannot get rid of the IDE drivers as not all of them have > replacements yet. However, I have now made the configuration changes > and upgrade script apply to all architectures, so for every device that > can be handled by either an IDE driver or a (stable) libata driver, the > libata driver will be used. The upgrade script will show an additional > note if it does not find a boot loader that it can handle automatically.
That sounds great Ben. Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201003211341.05251.elen...@planet.nl
