On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 03:45:40PM +0100, Tom Parker wrote: > On 26/04/10 15:32, maximilian attems wrote: > >coreutils is priority required, your box looks broken. > >please investigate how it came to missing mktemp. > >thanks > > There was an installed copy of coreutils, but version 6.10-6 which > doesn't contain mktemp. The issue is partly because this is a mixed > release box, with some stable, testing and unstable packages, but this > is still an issue that should be dealt with (partially because it may > cause weird upgrade issues for some users I suspect).
not sure that all packages using mktemp should now depend on some version of coreutils or older mktemp version. this looks like a multiple bug waiting to hit several packages. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
