On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 03:14:07PM +0100, Paul McEnery wrote: > How about this then.... libimobiledevice-utils supplying the udev rule > and pairing utility, and providing a virtual package which "Provides: > ipheth-support"? Maybe the provides bit is not required...
Why can't ipheth just depend on libimobiledevice-utils ? It *is* a functional dependency after all, even if they're not communicating directly with each other. OG. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
