Hi, netdev wasn't particularly interested, but Julius Volz, the author of this code directed me to the lvs-users mailing list. Nobody reported any problem since then, but I got a success report, see http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/163055/focus=11035
I also got a personal reply from Rob Gallagher. Quoting him: > From: Rob Gallagher <robert.gallag...@heanet.ie> > Subject: Re: Is CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6 still/really dangerous? > To: Ferenc Wagner <wf...@niif.hu> > Cc: Julius Volz <juli...@google.com> > Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:56:53 +0100 > > We've been using IPVS with IPv6 on our mirror site, ftp.heanet.ie, for > nearly a year now. > > The only major issue we encountered was with mtu discovery for some > users on IPv6 tunnels, however this was quickly resolved with a patch > from Julius that has since gone into the mainline kernel. The referenced patch is commit 94b26551: IPVS: Add handling of incoming ICMPV6 messages, which is seems to be already present in the Sid kernel. Based on the above, I don't think there are known problems with this option. While it's untested on the wider scale, it seems to work for those using it. Please consider enabling it, or tell me how I could help researching this further. -- Thanks, Feri. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87iq5cpqx3.fsf...@tac.ki.iif.hu