On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 05:32:58PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 21:28 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > However not this part. Only small commits are fixes and I consider the > > rest as hacks. > Which commits in particular?
As documented: bcf16b6b4f34fb40a7aaf637947c7d3bce0be671, a merge commit. > Have you raised your concerns upstream? Which upstream? The DRM people are upstream for AGP. I doubt that they even got there. > (or something equivalent). While these are clearly not suitable for > upstream they are correct as far as they go. Excluding them from the xen > flavour of the kernel seems a bit extreme. Someone have to explain them to the release team. As they are clearly not even remotely suitable for upstream, I'm not going to stretch the own rules further. > It would be a terrible shame if Squeeze did not have support for the > modern graphics subsystem when running Xen. Well. All the intel cards seems to work. Bastian -- But Captain -- the engines can't take this much longer! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
