On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Raphael Hertzog <[email protected]> wrote: > (Dropping bug report) > > On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Olaf van der Spek wrote: >> > Hence the fact that all file system developers, whether they were >> > btrfs developers or XFS developers or ext4 developers, made the joke >> > at the file system developers summit two years ago, that what the >> > application programmers really wanted was O_PONY, with the magic pixie >> > dust. Unfortunately: >> >> I think a lot would be happy with O_ATOMIC. > > Please don't hijack/spam a bugreport for random complaints about the design > of file systems. Ted's answer has been very valuable to solve the problem > we have and I really dislike when constructive threads turn into > bikeshedding over file system design. > > Thanks for your comprehension. Feel free to go discuss your issues on > upstream mailing lists.
This isn't about bikeshedding, it's about solving this general problem in a proper way. Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti�[email protected]
