From: Richard Mortimer <[email protected]> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 23:34:03 +0000
> I guess that points towards the binutils linker not doing the correct > thing. Ok, it is in fact doing the correct thing. I'm really surprised we never hit this before in all of these years :-) I guess we've simply never hit this kind of expression in a module before. The issue is that modules aren't a "final link", it's really more like an intermediate partial link. So we do end up seeing the R_SPARC_LO10 + R_SPARC_13 sequences in the final module object. Therefore, we really should handle R_SPARC_13 in the sparc module loader. Richard, I want you to get full credit for this since you did all of the dirty work :-) Would you please cons up a formal patch with commit message and signoff for this and I'll push it around? Thanks a lot! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
