On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote: > What about introducing a new linux-2.6-stable kernel package as a > compromise? That way users that want stability and security support > in testing continue to have that as an option. Also, I will assume > responsibility as the maintainer, so there will be hopefully very > little impact to any other part of Debian. Also, I can look at > generating d-i media for this kernel. > > Any thoughts on that? The only downside I can think of right away is > introducing a huge code copy into the archive.
Also the same effect can be achieved by apt-pinning the squeeze kernel. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTinNLPeSzJn+VhYMFn6om0duiYrX6=m6zjn2x...@mail.gmail.com
