On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:56:45PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > Bastian Blank <[email protected]> schrieb: > >> > > As I already pointed out on the first mail, Brad Sprengler has already > >> > > said he wasn't interested in upstreaming stuff. > >> > What Brad wants or don't want is irrelevant here. While the patch policy > >> > for the main kernel is rather strict, other featuresets can incorporate > >> > more changes. However this is no free ticket to push anything into it. > > > > Okay. Then I set the rules: > > * The patch must be minimal. This means: > > - Arbitrary fixes must go to mainline. > > - No style changes in random code. > > Sorry, it's not up to you to impose rules single-handedly.
this is not single handed. We are trying to minimise experimental stuff that hasn't had mainline exposure yet. > There are efforts by Kees and others to mainline some of the more general > bits of grsecurity, but that's not a reason to postpone a grsec flavour. Beside lots of talking of that effort I fail to see such a branch in linux-next: code speaks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
