Hi Ben, On Monday 23 May 2011 18:48:56 Ben Hutchings wrote: > > I believe this is a "major effect on the usability of a package, without > > rendering it completely unusable to everyone." > > [...] > > Well, not really. I agree this is an important feature, but generally > feature requests are still 'wishlist'. The only exception is for > missing hardware support which can be 'important'.
Sorry, me bad. I think Bastian has already reclassified this bug as a 'wishlist'. > Anyway, I have no objection to enabling this unless it is likely to > cause regressions for other NFS users. Thanks. There should be no direct effect: one has to specify the option "minorversion=1" before nfs-utils will attempt to mount with NFS v4.1. Without this option then NFS v4 would be attempted (if the server supports v4). I normally pull all my updates from sid; but if you let me know when there's a new kernel in experimental then I can test it, if that's any help. Cheers, Paul. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
